Return-Path: <tariqsaraj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBAA129EE7
 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id MXmvnfSmgQWV for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E14DC129EE1
 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a124so225359364ioe.2
 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; 
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=puApadjD4/2qosLcT+dwxaGyy0jfiRlofU67efbKQUk=;
 b=qrVRYQDf7HgOqiPegSYwkN1HFP/nBqzDQ94xSjxTf58Gn2aSHAOJT/W/HeRhrT4YnG
 Br4Urb/Xogs/HOff39m0kv71NEi44oKYhVG8Qmz2oXYxupJs0GozGVkjQtHLiHhHczp9
 8pjBsz0FMwsPEvfxXhACkWYATFIVhyqQsfESKTUdQqda3N6WJHlNFwQJvxbnto/hwaxe
 CErcioOLzMXsEKyL1Dx0GpZ7ZvwJB+4Lk6OovXqONCOzr1o342WHdSirciT1v6qdFhNE
 eSo8DPG3itKHYeuTJ+0mAtq+HRFpqC1kE/JCJdME4GX6l0d5xofu/q2bX3TRt2npZifr
 vGzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=puApadjD4/2qosLcT+dwxaGyy0jfiRlofU67efbKQUk=;
 b=dZhd3CXMnQ6NVE4v6FnZVox1E5magfn4fNS5FEolyJRxzmf9FwW/E9+OIEcPUt8WRt
 3LvrWpdJgx/vupRy74K5nEVOpzYuXpD16pahrIefOBoVJXNnyIx4vWKDyn9IxR636pBC
 L5fgtkLbEOGt5HJqePO8M5ZckrVU86JZXZIVMQNNLqKG2zGA4t++bHmWiMTwDASSkoz4
 /u2FRfO80c+VeRKgDFomGXGYopvyeKXte5bYqVHI2IFN+hduxSgY/JVqNCiYD9tx1eFU
 quH99Ks8wGfPcVh1wPRfX8tVqYrXmqCcM2l9zoR5y4ck+TojcJLYY/7ArQud9TJPq7GJ
 6A/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03sdqibejfMFrgpJoHcOnbjfAVfr1sTbzCCnX6hPeqGsz57/xTINx9KyFCZvht3lUH07lHrxh+OKcq7mA==
X-Received: by 10.36.178.81 with SMTP id h17mr17741034iti.98.1480334883947;
 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.254.9 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:08:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Tariq Saraj <tariqsaraj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:08:03 +0500
Message-ID: <CAAdbxrrft9MUSPzYWSZozxDQVaz-kydoczxD56uEP97Fd0EcEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045d96aee80aff05425b525b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/yTdSyYZNY_-dMlLxasi0M_aEStQ>
Subject: [dns-privacy] Scope of Privacy considerations
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>,
 <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>,
 <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:08:06 -0000

--f403045d96aee80aff05425b525b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,
The recursive resolver always resolves query on behalf of stub-resolver,
thus I am still worried that why the scope of confidentiality for DNS
messages is still a subject of interest.
As, privacy is mostly an individual specific issue, and the term Personally
Identifiable Information (PII) is very specific, yet the scope is a subject
of matter.

-- 
Regards
Tariq Saraj
Riphah Institute of Systems Engineering, Islamabad

--f403045d96aee80aff05425b525b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Hi all,<br></div>The recursive resolver always r=
esolves query on behalf of stub-resolver, thus I am still worried that why =
the scope of confidentiality for DNS messages is still a subject of interes=
t.<br></div>As, privacy is mostly an individual specific issue, and the ter=
m Personally Identifiable Information (PII) is very specific, yet the scope=
 is a subject of matter.<br clear=3D"all"><div><div><div><br>-- <br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"=
><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><font face=3D"comic =
sans ms,sans-serif">Regards<br><span style=3D"background-color:rgb(255,255,=
255)"><span style=3D"color:rgb(32,18,77)">Tariq Saraj</span><span></span></=
span><br></font></div><div><font face=3D"comic sans ms,sans-serif">Riphah I=
nstitute of Systems Engineering, Islamabad<br></font></div><font face=3D"co=
mic sans ms,sans-serif"><span style=3D"color:rgb(204,0,0)"></span><span sty=
le=3D"color:rgb(224,102,102)"></span><span style=3D"color:rgb(102,0,0)"></s=
pan><span style=3D"color:rgb(241,194,50)"></span><span style=3D"color:rgb(6=
1,133,198)"></span><b><span style=3D"color:rgb(102,102,102)"></span></b><br=
></font></div><font face=3D"comic sans ms,sans-serif"></font></div></div></=
div></div></div></div>
</div></div></div></div>

--f403045d96aee80aff05425b525b--

