IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 09 January 2020 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE7912007C; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:38:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EMH3-iv7lkhb; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E95A120019; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id AF66B2804E9; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:38:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id A73B7280678; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:38:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5AC2804E9; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:38:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [10.10.86.133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C346A9F3A0; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:38:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8333940A61; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:38:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:38:32 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk>
Cc: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, last-call@ietf.org, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Message-ID: <20200109163832.GA1702@nic.fr>
References: <4639bd67-6fca-47d1-aaeb-85fcd0394f46@www.fastmail.com> <7E5F804D-535F-4CB3-8F7F-ABD0ED4B833A@sinodun.com> <CABcZeBON0ung2htbaiKWGKJSUsHrPhrcEfJgVDoO3+UYCQZxsg@mail.gmail.com> <7729E44B-38EB-4EAF-8EFF-ED286696373E@sinodun.com> <CABcZeBNKsQ1pEVwxwYMgGTUhFntQ4h+L1Qyo=Q_nfN7p13y-UQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200109153037.GC28511@nic.fr> <B78BFED8-D2C3-46F5-A7FE-A3A123B0D95C@noware.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B78BFED8-D2C3-46F5-A7FE-A3A123B0D95C@noware.co.uk>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.2
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.024404, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.11.5.63017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/zpbT2sWMU_6cLeQTtapSw7k2PVI>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Last-Call] Review of draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis-03 - Section 3.5.1.1 Comments
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:38:38 -0000

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:26:01PM +0000,
 Neil Cook <neil.cook@noware.co.uk> wrote 
 a message of 22 lines which said:

> Well why not switch it the other way round and say that we
> definitely should for SMTP?

Note there is some work here:

draft-arkko-arch-dedr-report
draft-arkko-iab-internet-consolidation

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email