Re: [dns-privacy] Possible use case: Opportunistic encryption for recursive to authoritative

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

Does anyone have numbers on how many authoritative servers use anycast
for load balancing?

Brian

On 8/6/20 10:59 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. The following is a short text-based version of my slides from last week's WG meeting. I'd like to find out if this is one of the use cases that the WG would be interested in dealing with.
> 
> Use case: Opportunistic encryption for recursive to authoritative
> 
> In this use case, a resolver operator says “I’m happy to use encryption with the authoritative servers if it doesn’t slow down getting answers by much”, and an authoritative server says “I’m happy to use encryption with the recursive resolvers if it doesn’t cost me much”.
> 
> Opportunistic encryption is defined in RFC 7535. From the abstract: "Protocol designs based on Opportunistic Security use encryption even when authentication is not available, and use authentication when possible, thereby removing barriers to the widespread use of encryption on the Internet."
> 
> The assumptions behind the use case are:
> • More encryption is good for the Internet
> • Resolver vendors are smart and motivated
> • Most resolvers don’t validate with DNSSEC and may never want to
> • Authoritative operators don’t care much about encryption, but some would turn it on because more encryption is good for the Internet
> • Other use cases for authentication stronger than opportunistic may appear and would co-exist with this one
> 
> The other slides had thoughts about possible solutions that implement this use case, but before we go there, I wanted to find out if more than a handful of people here are interested in this use case. If so, I could turn the above into a draft with some possible solutions for us to bang on.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
>