Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon

If I recall correctly, there was significant support for
draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode
In fact, looking back, there was a WG Last Call issued on this draft
on April 13th of this year with favorable responses.

Can this be advanced?

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> The chairs have been asked by the AD's to prepare the working group
> for closing early next year.
>
> Before the working group closes we need to complete the drafts that
> are on our charter.
>
> Here is the list of current open milestones:
>  Apr 2011       RFC3597-bis Unknown RR advanced to IESG for PS
>  Jun 2011       EDNS0-bis update advanced to IESG
>  Aug 2011       Algorithm signaling document to IESG
>  Oct 2011       DNSSEC Errata document to IESG
>  Nov 2011       Decision about new protocol elements, if any
>  Nov 2011       Requirements and current state survey document to IESG
>            for publication
>  Dec 2011       IXFR-only to IESG
>
> As you can see we are far behind schedule thus we propose the
> following milestones
>  Dec 2011  DNSSEC-errata document to IESG
>  Jan 2012  RFC3597-bis To IESG for standard
>  Jan 2012  EDNS0-bis update to IESG
>  Feb 2012  IXFR-Only to IESG
>  Feb 2012  Algorithm signaling document to IESG
>  Mar 2012  Close down Working group
>
> Note that this removes the aliasing work from the work plan.  The
> draft is currently expired, and there was not general agreement about
> whether to wait on input from the current ICANN work on variants at
> the TLD (but apparently we did wait).  Since ICANN's project is not
> scheduled to complete before February of 2012, we can't realistically
> expect to complete a requirements document before March.  So we are
> planning not to complete that work item.  It is not clear whether a WG
> that is closing with unfinished business needs to recharter as a
> formal step; we're looking into that, and will return with an answer.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Olafur and Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext