Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT progress and possible meeting at IETF-80

Suzanne Woolf <woolf@isc.org> Fri, 11 February 2011 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <woolf@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965CA3A69DB for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:01:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QiBOjuM+yKPo for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:01:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991FC3A69AB for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:01:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bikeshed.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280705F98F3; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woolf@isc.org)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10265) id 35C03216C22; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:01:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:01:25 +0000
From: Suzanne Woolf <woolf@isc.org>
To: Vaggelis Segredakis <segred@ics.forth.gr>
Message-ID: <20110211020125.GA147@bikeshed.isc.org>
References: <4D48617E.1020408@ogud.com> <3A5CD55E5CCE43F0BA44AAC89BADB866@ics.forth.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3A5CD55E5CCE43F0BA44AAC89BADB866@ics.forth.gr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, 'Olafur Gudmundsson' <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT progress and possible meeting at IETF-80
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:01:23 -0000

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:11:54PM +0200, Vaggelis Segredakis wrote:
> We as the Registry of [.gr] domain names are still very much interested in
> the Aliasing Requirements item and the development of a "xNAME" identical
> tree solution.

This is good to know, as I am working on the -00 (WG item) of the
identical-resolution draft; it's behind schedule but definitely not
forgotten.

I expect to be in Prague and would work with you (or anyone
interested) there, as well as in email until then.

> We would be very happy to produce a comment of this document. If there is
> anyone else interested in that please feel free to contact me.

This would be helpful.

thanks,
Suzanne