Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Fri, 13 April 2012 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F93121F87DF for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YE-C03pQUrRz for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663A021F8629 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3DGHxUO040512; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:17:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201204131617.q3DGHxUO040512@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:24:43 +0200. <201204131524.RAA28225@TR-Sys.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:17:59 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:18:02 -0000
In your previous mail you wrote: > DNSEXT folks, in particular prospective implementers, => I have two comments about this: - first in fact it is not for DNSSEC implementers but more for implementers of the crypto used in DNSSEC. Note it is not a concern, IMHO it is better to know much than less. - the incentive is very USA centric. Russia (cf GOST) and France at least support the use of ECC too (of course references are in national languages, so not in english :-). Thanks Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Alfred Hönes
- [dnsext] informal publication space (was: RFC 660… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] informal publication space (was: RFC… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Francis Dupont
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A SM
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] RFC 6605 (ECDSA in DNSSEC) -- Q & A Alfred Hönes