IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] errata on RFC1034 for recursive aliasing and name based diffrentiation

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 04 March 2011 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632523A69D7 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:53:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKu6LFXWjooO for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D00F3A67F0 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 05:53:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 94901 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 14:09:25 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 14:09:25 -0000
Message-ID: <4D70EEF7.8030506@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:53:59 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20110227191542.6824.qmail@joyce.lan> <335963D7-3440-45E6-843C-38F419462792@cisco.com> <4D6C3FD3.7010801@ucd.ie> <20110303114148.A360FB98E2E@drugs.dv.isc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103031148130.14985@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <4D703A35.9080207@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4D705952.6000409@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110304120348.GE16012@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110304120348.GE16012@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] errata on RFC1034 for recursive aliasing and name based diffrentiation
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:53:39 -0000

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> Too many implementations have depended on the "no CNAME
> target" rule

For example?

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email