IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] URI RRTYPE review - Comments period end Aug 15th

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 26 July 2010 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587363A67AC; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mm1SbNUUUX3R; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE93A67EC; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OdC1U-000Jog-He for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:58:28 +0000
Received: from [131.112.32.132] (helo=necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>) id 1OdC1R-000JoE-Bz for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:58:25 +0000
Received: (qmail 10535 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 01:04:47 -0000
Received: from softbank219001188004.bbtec.net (HELO ?192.168.1.21?) (219.1.188.4) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 26 Jul 2010 01:04:47 -0000
Message-ID: <4C4CDD26.9020800@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:56:06 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
CC: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] URI RRTYPE review - Comments period end Aug 15th
References: <20100725184119.GA42253@registro.br> <4C4C8FE8.8090305@knipp.de> <4C4CC6BB.7040003@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <AANLkTinOAikAPH5JbZ1RJsEX2p536LOh+yOutWC_Oq2M@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinOAikAPH5JbZ1RJsEX2p536LOh+yOutWC_Oq2M@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> As far as the infrastructure is concerned there is absolutely no
> difference. DNS does not need to know the semantics of the bits being
> shipped.

RFC3987 says:

   a.  A protocol or format element should be explicitly designated to
       be able to carry IRIs.

> The justification for IRIs is that they are friendlier for human use.

IRIs are unusably human unfriendly.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email