Re: [dnsext] Plan to wrap up the Working Group
Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Mon, 05 December 2011 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A786F21F8C04 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:21:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VOikhDZ-WHCg for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gy0-f194.google.com (mail-gy0-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2222D21F8BF4 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ghrr16 with SMTP id r16so1345120ghr.1 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:21:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KXNm1rYy4w3LDPBwfLaQ0rYsrD3v/o91JldgSlj7c/g=; b=K2fM4u3hQFBF38TeHvEZq6LJFVfdiTenipo8YAEcxtRQWEcEk3N5TXChqP7ziey9nG urN971BhfPP10hF6eygL/iLx0boXb+f5kCYYbFVnNR8Llq/quqkdzyOQS9HdHxhRz9gx NsD/mQfKnx+UUeNheqx1sN7POhuAWpIq/5xgE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.22.136 with SMTP id t8mr12022101yht.30.1323094892504; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.132.15 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:21:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111202214204.GY61329@shinkuro.com>
References: <4EC4D950.2020501@ogud.com> <20111202214204.GY61329@shinkuro.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:21:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHqYK-tPEOVbQi30RN1eirrOVJQZr6wTZPxj3XcQsKZRd+xr-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f50338612672404b3590908"
Cc: dnsext-ads@tools.ietf.org, dnsext-chairs chairs <dnsext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Plan to wrap up the Working Group
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:21:34 -0000
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>wrote: > > The chairs have been asked by the AD's to prepare the working group > for closing early next year. > > > Note that this removes the aliasing work from the work plan. The > draft is currently expired, and there was not general agreement about > whether to wait on input from the current ICANN work on variants at > the TLD (but apparently we did wait). Since ICANN's project is not > scheduled to complete before February of 2012, we can't realistically > expect to complete a requirements document before March. So we are > planning not to complete that work item. It is not clear whether a WG > that is closing with unfinished business needs to recharter as a > formal step, but our AD hasn't suggested that we need to. > > FWIW, I'm still willing to work on wrapping up this item, if only because there's a document that needs to be written for certain external audiences whether it's an RFC or not. However, I don't think it should stand in the way of concluding DNSEXT. Suzanne
- [dnsext] Plan to wrap up the Working Group Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] Plan to wrap up the Working Group Suzanne Woolf