IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-01

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 02 April 2012 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5C221F8690 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.615, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZSHG-6jFR+v for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89D321F8680 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:43961) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1SEk2u-0002xS-Wm (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:23:56 +0100
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1SEk2u-0008EJ-3j (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:23:56 +0100
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:23:56 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1E10703D-4769-4089-ABE7-C23813E30D43@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1204021723320.17365@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <4DE8BF39-7E68-4F10-BFBE-F4D408628929@gmail.com> <1E10703D-4769-4089-ABE7-C23813E30D43@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-01
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:23:58 -0000

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On Mar 26, 2012, at 3:29 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>
> > I support the idea of moving ECDSA to "Recommended".
>
> +1

Sounds good to me, but are there any implementations yet?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Portland, Plymouth: North 3 or 4, backing northwest 5 or 6 later. Slight or
moderate. Showers later. Moderate or good.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status