Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (4622)

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 19 February 2016 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6931B31DA for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:44:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjxA_KApYjWU for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:44:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B195A1B320A for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:44:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.122] (50-1-98-216.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u1JFilHF044976 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:44:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-216.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.216] claimed to be [10.32.60.122]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:44:47 -0800
Message-ID: <D1C8DFDF-E63E-49D2-B250-760CBBAC50DD@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <56C7309D.8080603@innovationslab.net>
References: <20160218013620.0ABC6180209@rfc-editor.org> <56C7309D.8080603@innovationslab.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/3vgxde8_wSJqOWQR-sEcY6vZ-VQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:34:05 -0800
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org, geoff-s@panix.com, Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>, ogud@ogud.com
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5155 (4622)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:44:55 -0000

On 19 Feb 2016, at 7:11, Brian Haberman wrote:

> Does anyone have an opinion on the validity of this erratum? It seems
> like a reasonable clarification in my reading.

This was discussed on the DNSOP mailing list and folks agreed with the 
clarification.

--Paul Hoffman