IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-02

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 17 June 2011 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1645A11E8145 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7W2Uqzj-0YQ for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D88211E812C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 73634 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2011 01:53:43 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 17 Jun 2011 01:53:43 -0000
Message-ID: <4DFAB161.8030108@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:44:01 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <4DB81069.3080404@nic.cz> <4DF9B5BD.7010900@nic.cz> <a06240803ca1fd7525c50@10.31.201.23> <BANLkTinjRDHyKH-tLEoejodXb2+7qQLO7w@mail.gmail.com> <20110617001740.D2B9F10D52C8@drugs.dv.isc.org> <4DFAA8CC.5040802@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110617012827.5A8AD10D5D42@drugs.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110617012827.5A8AD10D5D42@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ah-dnsext-rfc1995bis-ixfr-02
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:45:23 -0000

Mark Andrews wrote:

> The problem is sending a AXFR style
> response when you don't have the requested starting serial but do
> have a potential starting serial that is before the requested
> starting serial.

I wrote:

>> Consolidations following the paragraph above may still cause
>> transient inefficiency. But, does that matter and worth protocol
>> extensions and additional operational complexities?

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email