IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Summary: What to do with expired signatures

Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com> Tue, 12 February 2002 16:28 UTC

Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA17188 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:28:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16affA-0008Zm-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:20:12 -0800
Received: from shell.nominum.com ([128.177.192.160]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16aff9-0008Zg-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:20:11 -0800
Received: from shell.nominum.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65A83190C; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:20:10 -0800 (PST)
To: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Summary: What to do with expired signatures
In-Reply-To: Message from Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com> of "Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:06:17 EST." <v03130303b88eec7b4996@[192.35.165.115]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:20:10 -0800
Message-ID: <41600.1013530810@shell.nominum.com>
From: Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

>>>>> "Edward" == Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com> writes:

    Edward> Given that there is but one testbable
    Edward> implementation of RFC 2535, it has become easy to confuse
    Edward> that implementation with the protocol.

Doesn't Olaf's Perl version of 2535 qualify as a second implementation?
IIRC it found a bug in the BIND footprint calculation.

to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status