IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-05 (was: DNSEXT closing down soon)

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 11 January 2012 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C1E1F0C4B for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:34:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.682
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7o0j-gwIZF89 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834651F0C46 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D8D71ECB41D for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:34:36 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:34:34 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120111203434.GH2024@mail.yitter.info>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <CAF4+nEGmCQCFhGzMDw0ERS+8Kb2ftAbNeBvVwdd228gLa1NdDA@mail.gmail.com> <20120110145640.GC6201@crankycanuck.ca> <6BC842FB-FC81-4B1A-8EFF-735314D77141@hopcount.ca> <20120111162112.GD1334@mail.yitter.info> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C1580D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C1580D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-05 (was: DNSEXT closing down soon)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:34:38 -0000

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:14:04PM -0800, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>  I've read it and I support its publication as well.  I have some
> edits to propose, which I can contribute as part of a formal AppsDir
> review if you like since they are not major.

I think it's as well to send this as part of that review, if you don't
mind, just so that we can get this document moving.

> Are you planning to make this a WG document or send it through under
> its current name?

I was going to ship it as is as the product of the WG, but your remark
made me realise that there's a bureaucratic snafu that results in that
case.  So it'll have to get a name change.  Sigh.  I'll get Donald to
submit it with the changed name, but it will otherwise be exactly the
same as passed WGLC.

Thanks for tweaking me on this, it was a silly mistake to make.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status