IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> Thu, 17 February 2011 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF463A6DF6 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:35:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jth5E-saL4b0 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucd.ie (mgmtirp1.ucd.ie [137.43.231.111]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B00A3A6DF1 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:35:35 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnQIAIekXE3BAaiL/2dsb2JhbACCPqNcc7t7hV4Ejz4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,486,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="2652897"
Received: from dhcp-c101a88b.ucd.ie ([193.1.168.139]) by smtp.ucd.ie with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 Feb 2011 12:36:05 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <FE84DBFDC90044FEBA93FBA57282DAF4@ics.forth.gr>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:36:05 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1FBC914F-F502-4233-AC6C-E7A37728C103@ucd.ie>
References: <4D5B5E81.1050602@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110216073338.7251.qmail@joyce.lan> <F21692535B1A478F95D9E3AA048E8037@ics.forth.gr> <4D5C3B53.8080909@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FE84DBFDC90044FEBA93FBA57282DAF4@ics.forth.gr>
To: Vaggelis Segredakis <segred@ics.forth.gr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:35:37 -0000

On 17 Feb 2011, at 08:47, Vaggelis Segredakis wrote:

> Usually they get two to four names. There is no real limit though. Not all
> domain names create huge bundles and even if they do, how many would a user
> choose to pay for and for what benefit?

	Is that to say that the typicl registrant gets 2-4 names from
	the .GR registry, and may then add further multiplicity further
	down the hierarchy, depending on requirements and resources?

	Thanks for confirming and/or clarifying.

	VBR
	Niall O'Reilly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email