[dnsext] SRV prefix registry

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 22 December 2011 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9E021F8B8F for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:20:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XDXyUW1XjmMB for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:20:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A395421F8B8E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:20:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ggnk5 with SMTP id k5so7031701ggn.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:20:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=W3nVBQZiimDJ88C+0BJgykRB7cldx2bZ+uelk6WFM7Q=; b=MFI5krA6wXukFZC7XVphvHn/TJ2Kra+QRaBZCCVsoAVE6DZIjSBFTJWu6lOBIc3hnt BIBL5rvYi9GZTdW1tHNTGuK2s+ZSahPZu0YlpSWk0cJogCOARGcmn80o7yuoulTPZOZL zP8V2N9kqJx1g63nSv7MAPWw+f788Joz3ZIVY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.88.99 with SMTP id bf3mr8933367obb.73.1324560026817; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.134.70 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:20:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwijkTrKcAL99pgzw2ULmvt-R1KG7TsRsgBmEK_QVs_CRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9399d3be1d3ed04b4ae2949"
Subject: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:20:28 -0000

One piece of unfinished business that really should be cleared up before
DNSEXT closes is the lack of an IANA registry for SRV prefixes.

This is now a big problem because people have been taking maters into their
own hands. I did for SAML and XKMS. There are many thousand SRV prefixes in
use. They should be recorded 'somewhere'.


I can write up a short draft if there is interest.

As a practical matter the registry will have to be 'first come first
served' for the second tier names at least. Perhaps an expert review for
proposals to introduce a new group (_tcp, _udp, _port ... ).

The same registry would be shared across all prefixed protocols.

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/