Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 30 March 2011 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EA83A67CC for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jFv-o79uIyzH for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2169D3A697B for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bikeshed.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11204C944E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:96:6233:4bff:fe01:7585]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D403F216C56 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F33DAE8BE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:09:46 +1100 (EST)
To: dnsext@ietf.org
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:09:46 +1100
Message-Id: <20110330120946.D7F33DAE8BE@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Design team report on dnssec-bis-updates and CD bit
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:08:13 -0000

There is a fourth model not described.

CD  F/C line    conditions      action
==================================================================
1   F   D1                      Set CD=1
0   F   D2      no trust anchor Set CD=0
0   F   D3      trust anchor    CD=0 initially,
                                CD=1 on validation failure/RCODE=2
1   C   D4      behave as D1
0   C   D5      return cache

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE:	+61 2 9871 4742		         INTERNET: marka@isc.org