Re: [dnsext] CAA RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 11th

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Wed, 09 March 2011 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E573A6A5D for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:38:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GxkLz9yieFQm for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B663A6989 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:38:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D6151ECB408; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:39:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:39:26 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110309203926.GN32629@shinkuro.com>
References: <20110218213453.GB96163@registro.br> <AANLkTi=gfTHvyBrBJhZ4TQhq6xumFuFZuyP-JgSOyZOK@mail.gmail.com> <20110309194411.GG32629@shinkuro.com> <AANLkTimrE=A2n919b=3oOd80onJrYJYzH0jNrGBJCrsa@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimrE=A2n919b=3oOd80onJrYJYzH0jNrGBJCrsa@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] CAA RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 11th
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:38:13 -0000

On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:32:27PM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> The change took place in the -02 version of the draft that is specified in
> the template.
> 
> I have submitted a new -03 version of the draft that clarify the description
> of the RRTYPE but do not change the proposal from that described in -02.

Gotcha.  Thanks.  Sorry I was confused.
 
> The -03 draft provides additional documentation but does not modify the -02
> RRTYPE definition submitted in January.
> 
> The template does not specify the version number of the draft.

Excellent.  Very helpful.  Thanks!

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.