Re: [dnsext] Report from the chairs for IETF 80

[Matthijs Mekking <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On 03/28/2011 10:51 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>     draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates
> 
>         - A couple outstanding issues were rectified, and the editors
>           have received instructions on how to update the text to
>           reflect the consensus about CD bit handling.  We expect a
>           new issue soon.
> 
>           There is a new issue that has come up recently, having to do
>           with how many RRSIGs should be sent with the SOA record in
>           both AXFR and IXFR.  Please see the discussion on the list. 

I think it would also be good if we could come to a consensus on
clarifying how the resolver should interpret section 2.2 (RFC 4035) (see
the discussion on 'Clarifying the mandatory algorithm rules').

Best regards,

Matthijs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNkHsnAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5uwEIAKTJvJUeXHwihcw6heh+pJN5
v8Nqge9cBOHedheiqR2Qv9PwyCRveO6k4/cdO7j6uUYp/txVqhHvwxc2yjI5S7H1
gumYlo4TBsk3aEHpOfroisXrCGCn/ILTsJtI/JRDjXNXHb31pLS59IvF4QNdLqlp
oFoIbgLWVD1RECLF4t1ZdGC7iMYfyXUxB+DwQ+cvyhRSzJXhKEYYvHBY7X5Ng9tR
27WhJsLeXbZl4APekpwYJvBoA6WXc3rYaa1jquWiuuQ4IXNSoLkytdTGQ8IKAE8u
b1fkJyFDyqFZIg5KhZbzujoAtUF/WqOTM6dYtIjurPO9Q/E0+nL81h/a70n9fjM=
=4yKd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----