[dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 23 April 2013 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E162B21F9603; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNGy0belbBkj; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F023121F95FD; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.133.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3NMDitm000685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1366755240; bh=EParNmEN1TE6CBdYRcY2umSS2BtDMmAHhgCq3DxR2Os=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=qyI7+gg2F/GiKWagsQlM9EtOL7kjyGi19En+RBND0RMmpH7r5vvkDedlLDICf4vl+ MlrBXhN2LvlhaMfB0t14hTDjVCzyqVQ3c/te8w1kosh+2kCx8EOYjDDQmVVydgCHVg Fq4fBlGmJ6X0YuWQ/bRispF0pkMlWHE3QUidIJAM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1366755240; i=@elandsys.com; bh=EParNmEN1TE6CBdYRcY2umSS2BtDMmAHhgCq3DxR2Os=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc; b=1eX5jA7a7W33hcthr19xfkUiUT6s9o4OsoJz7XkFMsarw6GUNAzxBHcs+yI66lNOr TtxbJvU/pR2lu7ntfJbfCjqDfodBljHrW99Lh66vynnhwS0YNuUmESDr8pxd1vcbE0 aALFFy+aWzNkeSXPxZf/0lxbtBirbB/l6z4lINjY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130423150008.0c2c0558@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:03:45 -0700
To: dnsext@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:08:38 -0700
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:14:02 -0000

Hello,

Section 13.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14 obsoletes the SPF RRTYPE:

   'IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying
    "(OBSOLETE - use TXT)" in the DNS Parameters registry.'

Is the annotation in the DNS Parameters registry correct?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy (as document shepherd)