Re: [dnsext] [dns-rrtype-applications] New RR Application - DOA

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Fri, 28 July 2017 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3497E120721 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZsKBMMQT3Ro for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x244.google.com (mail-qt0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC75131C04 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x244.google.com with SMTP id d10so11520385qtb.4 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2Hvd5M675/s0ZBmkshMVcTN6nbKWcQ94+bHBCDiTowo=; b=cVqkoeVYLqlvkKmBx7Yy2MEQvnfqZ9WJiGEe55iKfFEF8Aq8/Gm+UGaBD1TK8Qvy7v MMM8+G1w1UCGCU05iw7P1u4z7PKMEAv7lbKlIngR6MTCobthpsV+k2dobDkleoCBbAbC zK/ZhADpOr6+aPx8IPg44SlhKHOvukHnE/tGxseGZ8QnXCZ85kyAlDdWc6/SUlT3oqcZ Kax1ua4UnqQ0LTxMbfD36pYwE4NGFTS320CPDVLtjUQXcylher222x199PTtd2cx0/JF 5jp1FMkAN60aktw7uJe8NvlWpDtjAJ3IDkoQDJ5mqWcdRjtRqgT5SDlIPJx+JQRJLbv7 /HrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2Hvd5M675/s0ZBmkshMVcTN6nbKWcQ94+bHBCDiTowo=; b=FOKPWz4eT1S5aVJQ6puQsiRA9i37C5O1zP3MedYWqkc2BLtfnctjrVqvmxicdWEnhR VEKfj5q8sYIznMNu6jRHgUdErkvnkU5IE48wxDqU8+SSYlUMwzAWiwjG4UcfdRy4NM38 aBCnuW/8X62ycDOQRZ54T8ox9NBt5DQgqfPDsbtdFsT9KwLaktQvAhabw0V52k6FgeX7 RE0KoADCMNrBK5eRy0NpOviPzFhI60cQQ28JDB+/hZbUlY5UjnWqje7vGzl54C4A4w2d mrvdXVTgkHHihuaFVBFqLOiQaJf/7Z3iLt6M3zBp9WLLxDD0J9xzVirHoz4NCWk1Eh2A NZTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1104Spb7BpvUF+cmOjvWo2D+GjRuEny7Ccr5wCXXV6mDMBYlEvqy OTWKYRBr6cOn9w==
X-Received: by 10.200.51.13 with SMTP id t13mr11357292qta.28.1501250703663; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c381:c20:79c8:d533:65e1:e059? ([2601:181:c381:c20:79c8:d533:65e1:e059]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r49sm16012026qte.34.2017.07.28.07.05.02 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170727225128.GC38856@isc.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:05:01 -0400
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@icann.org>, ray@isc.org, IETF DNSEXT WG <dnsext@ietf.org>, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <528C592E-EC3D-4039-97E0-8FD74A137B36@gmail.com>
References: <b8d7c716-22ab-0fe5-00e2-dc8da3b7da2c@bellis.me.uk> <9E44247D-8543-49F2-A8E2-892B3D34C16F@ogud.com> <CAF4+nEH0NXLo6YGRWTjJozUjr-1tSewrGMTMXB0t3C3XAK4ckw@mail.gmail.com> <20170727225128.GC38856@isc.org>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/AB1XCqTArOMZtbOwP9oskes4KNA>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [dns-rrtype-applications] New RR Application - DOA
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:05:06 -0000

(I co-chair DNSOP, but no hat here.)

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 6:51 PM, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>; wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>> When ever I see DOA, I think "Dead On Arrival" but I don't have any
>> good short alternative to suggest...
> 
> I have the exact same reaction, and would have suggested changing it
> to DOARC if I'd noticed this draft earlier in the process, but given that
> there are already experimental implementations, I guess this suggestion has
> been rendered moot and nonoperative even before I made it.  If only I could
> think of a pithy way to express that concept...


Without more information about a deployed base, it’s hard to understand possible ramifications of change in the mnemonic, but I respectfully suggest the requester could change the requested mnemonic if they want. 

I suspect the expert can also suggest or support such a change in the interest of avoiding confusion in other contexts, even though RFC 6895 doesn’t explicitly say so.


Suzanne