Re: [dnsext] Report from the chairs for IETF 80

"Rose, Scott W." <scott.rose@nist.gov> Mon, 28 March 2011 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.rose@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776B13A6A59 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tqRg-0uQ91i for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.nist.gov (rimp1.nist.gov [129.6.16.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7133A67D1 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov (WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov [129.6.18.19]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p2SI4BQZ011798 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:04:11 -0400
Received: from MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov ([fe80::d479:3188:aec0:cb66]) by WSXGHUB2.xchange.nist.gov ([129.6.18.19]) with mapi; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:03:35 -0400
From: "Rose, Scott W." <scott.rose@nist.gov>
To: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:04:10 -0400
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] Report from the chairs for IETF 80
Thread-Index: AcvtcnRyStw6yZW+SqepOTeAPIm+Dg==
Message-ID: <F91923C3-4B25-41F8-8708-0E1C49DC6858@nist.gov>
References: <20110328085104.GJ85412@crankycanuck.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20110328085104.GJ85412@crankycanuck.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-NIST-MailScanner-From: scott.rose@nist.gov
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Report from the chairs for IETF 80
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:02:48 -0000

On Mar 28, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> 
> 
>    draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname
> 
>        - Contemporary with IETF 79, the chairs committed to running a
>          last call on this draft.  They failed to do so.
> 

There was still this open issue:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg10339.html

Not a lot of discussion, still accepting input if there are any dissenting views.

> 
>    draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal
> 
>        - This draft is being shepherded by Patrik Fältström.  It has
>          not engendered much discussion since the -00 was uploaded.
>          Does that mean people think it is ready?
> 

There were some comments.  Will post -01 version of the draft before expiration (~2 weeks).

Scott

===================================
Scott Rose
NIST
scottr@nist.gov
+1 301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671
http://www.dnsops.gov/
===================================