IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 20 November 2013 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329D51AE34A for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0R16-dr538Y7 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5E91AE349 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUoxWcBFtfW0g9Rb1kbb0jBjBIIJu5lQu@postini.com; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:01 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDC91B82C3 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80473190043; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:28:00 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131120055158.GB7117@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:27:56 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <E44204A9-6BF0-4D1D-AA83-B6F40C43CD52@nominum.com>
References: <CFD6B510-D70E-4308-BF3E-B2E7C2ADCBEB@nominum.com> <20131120055158.GB7117@vacation.karoshi.com.>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "<dnsext@ietf.org> Group" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:28:08 -0000

On Nov 20, 2013, at 12:51 AM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> why do you ask?

Conflict review.  My impression is the same, and it can be argued that since DNSEXT no longer exists, there can't be a conflict.  But I wanted to bounce it off the list before making that claim, since in principle the work could be done in INTAREA, but would probably be done by people who read this mailing list.

Thanks!

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status