Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Michael Sheldon <msheldon@godaddy.com> wrote:
> In section 3.1:
> "There are currently five QTYPEs
>    assigned: * (ALL), MAILA, MAILB, AXFR, and IXFR."
>
> I would consider changing "* (ALL)" to "* (ALL/ANY)"
>
> While officially type 255 is * ALL, just about every implementation I've
> ever seen refers to it as ANY.

If no one objects, I wouldn't mind making the above change.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

> Michael Sheldon
> Dev-DNS Services
> GoDaddy.com
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance
>> From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
>> Date: Mon, June 11, 2012 10:43 am
>> To: "<dnsext@ietf.org>" <dnsext@ietf.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear colleagues
>>
>> This message starts a 2 week WGLC for RFC6195bis ending at midnight UTZ
>> June 28'th 2012.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-02
>>
>> This document addresses known flaws in the RFC6195 (see appendix A).
>>
>> Please review the document and post a note that you have reviewed the
>> document we need a minimum of 5 reviewers.
>>
>>      Olafur & Andrew
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnsext mailing list
>> dnsext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext