Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Sun, 01 July 2012 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10F21F8897 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 16:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YbUWLt1S9l6 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 16:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f42.google.com (mail-yw0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D624421F8692 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 16:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhfq11 with SMTP id q11so4491597yhf.15 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9YtvYYDZRJlLyn7DMTaqAveUg66+r5Wznb0LrPipgic=; b=mvcF80a4G9jXUjWVbze8q8npQ8euLn3t92Nz29jvsUPIFdPG/7ReJQdJLRkkgeFsij Z+4WGZJvcksC5YBXi/kvuOpU9lArzxtT4+fAahOJ5EMw4zGtn5UZwzFFQdWWf4LXavty TE+QmqgSvub2WBbx7gAWMQpAplzxBxMDYCa3HGeNNi+FykwSCKzboo0WpDChyTPcx0xB dds1lL0MG66RiGnHwYGn8/ZCUzAMh/3me7rYczqEiYAirzEhewRNFmm/W3VhQWXJnCfN OALL70Sg3zrPNa8fqhRMcrFajhaqNcLo9Qin+x2/8fJLG67AOeTbdqBzWobdkQazv72P I+kA==
Received: by 10.50.194.200 with SMTP id hy8mr5848876igc.58.1341185291402; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.16.227 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 16:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120613090016.205a61dff9fc1684c258b274662bb912.d2ce8b95d9.wbe@email00.secureserver.net>
References: <20120613090016.205a61dff9fc1684c258b274662bb912.d2ce8b95d9.wbe@email00.secureserver.net>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 19:27:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGbZavii4p_km2kRik-5B2RB19wJ2TFZJ-tSbX-x=Nh6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Sheldon <msheldon@godaddy.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 23:28:10 -0000

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Michael Sheldon <msheldon@godaddy.com> wrote:
> In section 3.1:
> "There are currently five QTYPEs
>    assigned: * (ALL), MAILA, MAILB, AXFR, and IXFR."
>
> I would consider changing "* (ALL)" to "* (ALL/ANY)"
>
> While officially type 255 is * ALL, just about every implementation I've
> ever seen refers to it as ANY.

If no one objects, I wouldn't mind making the above change.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

> Michael Sheldon
> Dev-DNS Services
> GoDaddy.com
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance
>> From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
>> Date: Mon, June 11, 2012 10:43 am
>> To: "<dnsext@ietf.org>" <dnsext@ietf.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear colleagues
>>
>> This message starts a 2 week WGLC for RFC6195bis ending at midnight UTZ
>> June 28'th 2012.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-02
>>
>> This document addresses known flaws in the RFC6195 (see appendix A).
>>
>> Please review the document and post a note that you have reviewed the
>> document we need a minimum of 5 reviewers.
>>
>>      Olafur & Andrew
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnsext mailing list
>> dnsext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext