Subject: [dnsext] RE: draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 -- a more versatile proposal
From: <[email-masked]>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:51:55 +0100
List-Id: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

Dear Stephane,

Thank you for the clarification.

I think that a generic solution to retrieve several records using the same query would be more useful that restricting it to IPv4-IPv6 use case (which is by the way my interest as described in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-behave-dns-a64-01#section-4.7).

Cheers,
Med

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Envoyé : lundi 9 novembre 2009 08:26
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP
Cc : [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Objet : Re: draft-li-dnsext-ipv4-ipv6 -- a more versatile proposal

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 02:31:29PM +0100,  [email-masked] <[email-masked]> wrote  a message of 70 lines which said:

> But, do we have other use cases (!# than the one defined in draft-li)?

Mentioned by Alfred: TXT records together with PTR records on DNSBL lookups, mail policy TXT RRs together with MX RRs.

Mentioned by me: SPF and TXT records for SPF lookups (RFC 4408, section 4.4).

*********************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. 
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
Messages are susceptible to alteration. 
France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender.
********************************