Re: [dnsext] [spfbis] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

Thanks.  Having looked at that, I think that the text in the original question 
from sm is OK (modulo we don't redesign things - please keep that in a 
different subthread).

Scott K

On Friday, April 26, 2013 03:55:01 PM David Conrad wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> As I pointed out to Paul Hoffman, the message I sent that I believe started
> this thread said:
> 
> "It is in keeping with past practice, e.g., see the notations for MD, MF,
> A6, and the MAILA RRtypes at
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xml."
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 
> On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> > On 4/23/2013 3:03 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> Section 13.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14 obsoletes the SPF RRTYPE:
> >>   'IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying
> >>   
> >>    "(OBSOLETE - use TXT)" in the DNS Parameters registry.'
> >> 
> >> Is the annotation in the DNS Parameters registry correct?
> > 
> > Dear DNSEXT,
> > 
> > For all of the really interesting side discussions that have developed
> > since SM sent this initial query, I believe there have not been any
> > responses that answered the question that was asked.
> > 
> > DNSEXT was asked to provide expert review of this specific bit of text. 
> > The text is intended to be comparable to the way that some other, similar
> > situations have already been handled.
> > 
> > d/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spfbis mailing list
> spfbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis