IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 06 December 2011 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7954D21F8B10 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:55:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vITB1DGZFcRU for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826B121F84B1 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spite.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.72) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:54:59 -0800
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:54:59 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:54:58 -0800
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
Thread-Index: Acyy/ufgp/TGdWJZQCCHi9ZlyW0QDQBYrgpw
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15432@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <EEAE3014-48B5-4344-B253-7A2269447EA5@cisco.com> <20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.> <A48F2510-A84D-461B-AA9C-8BA29B8503F0@rfc1035.com> <20111204232556.GA30268@vacation.karoshi.com.> <7A0435E4-C0D0-4D0B-A6C0-B2704B8AFFC3@rfc1035.com> <20111205023930.GA30651@vacation.karoshi.com.> <20111205033509.GC84440@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111205033509.GC84440@shinkuro.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:55:06 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 7:35 PM
> To: dnsext@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
> 
> The Directorate's composition will, I suppose, perhaps need adjustment,
> because two of its members (Olafur and me) will disappear:
> our roles are ex-officio, and in the event there's no office, there's
> no office to be out of.

You could become regular members, depending on what their rites of passage for admission are.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status