Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for participation

"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> Fri, 20 July 2001 12:59 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dnsop@cafax.se
Subject: Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for participation
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010719220418.03084d78@jurassic>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Message-Id: <E15NZg9-0006W0-00@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 05:46:49 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

1. I won't be at the meeting. However, I strongly support elimination of
A6/DNAME: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html

2. There's a common error in the evaluation of DNSSEC signing costs. I'd
like to draw attention to a new section that I've added to my web page
to analyze this error: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/killa6.html#signingcosts

3. I don't understand why this is an ngtrans issue rather than an ipngwg
issue. The question is not how to move smoothly to A6/DNAME; the
question is whether we want A6/DNAME at all.

---Dan


to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.

NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for particip… Alain Durand
Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for part… D. J. Bernstein
Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for part… Andreas Gustafsson