[dnsext] Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 (7972 )

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rob,
At 08:02 PM 05-06-2024, Rob Austein wrote:
>Well, it's been nearly twenty years, and I don't feel terribly
>strongly about this, but since Nate raised the point:
>
>I think I disagree.  "MUST" is keyword, "must" is not.  It probably
>would have been advisable to avoid the non-keyword "must" due to the
>risk of this confusion, but "MUST be aware" does not seem actionable
>to me, nor does it seem likely to be what the author of the original
>text (who may or may not have been me) intended.

With hindsight I might say that the text could have been written differently.

The proposed change is not an editorial change given that it would 
change what was intended at the time the RFC was published.  I 
suggest that the erratum be marked as "rejected".

Regards,
S. Moonesamy