IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 25 November 2013 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCCA1ADED7 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:59:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXRqNZUnqq_p for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:8::e:f32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABCB1ADEA7 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:59:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:44721) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1VkyZ4-0002ya-2X (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:59:10 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1VkyZ4-0004aU-Nd (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:59:10 +0000
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:59:10 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Jelte Jansen <jelte.jansen@sidn.nl>
In-Reply-To: <52937303.4070904@sidn.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311251558261.11548@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CFD6B510-D70E-4308-BF3E-B2E7C2ADCBEB@nominum.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311201202570.11548@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <21132.63250.716415.755401@gro.dd.org> <20131125140508.GB20994@miek.nl> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1311251538220.24198@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <52937303.4070904@sidn.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Authenticated denial of existence...
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:59:14 -0000

Jelte Jansen <jelte.jansen@sidn.nl> wrote:
>
> now that you quote it like that, I think that using 'allowed' in that
> first line is misleading; it's not so much that the protocol doesn't
> allow on-line signing, the requirement was that it didn't have to rely
> on it. Also, IIRC the preferred term was on-the-fly rather than on-line.

Good points. What's the best opposite for on-the-fly? Pre-signed?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first.
Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good,
occasionally poor at first.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status