[dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Tue, 10 May 2011 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759A8E0828 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58bsGE16xmxa for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 08:28:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27265E0749 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 08:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4AEPmPb081507 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ogud@ogud.com)
Message-ID: <4DC94AE6.5000903@ogud.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:25:42 -0400
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Subject: [dnsext] WGLC ENDS0-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:28:26 -0000

Dear Colleagues


This message starts a Working Group Last Call for
"Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)" located at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-05
As the document is replacing a Standards Track document this document is 
on Standards Track.

This WGLC will conclude on midnight May 25'th 2011 EDT.

This document obsoletes RFC2671.  The big changes from RFC2671 are:
   - explicit usage of RFC2119 terms and labeling EDNS0 support as MUST;
   - discussion on payload sizes and selection;
   - closing of the extended label types registry and classifying 	
        bit-labels as Historic;
   - cleanup of IANA actions (that did not take place when RFC2671
       was issued).

Other than these there are no changes from RFC2671.

Please send statements that you have reviewed this document and if it 
raised any issues. Remember we need 5 a minimum of 5 reviewers to say 
they reviewed the document.

     Olafur & Andrew