Re: [dnsext] draft-jabley-dnsop-validator-bootstrap-00

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 01 February 2011 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C63A6C00 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:41:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ex93VIEkHDC1 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:41:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888B43A6D59 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so2852563gxk.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:44:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mTqDCXdMGVTTPqyNB5QtHkJEYpoNp6OfAVgoYw+on2s=; b=g6XWwMFpdeYB3UX6f0ugWMTggzGp1eiC9y+WhUzJjV1Idz36rGnc6OHdFIwEkRKSP3 Acym8bzx+7suYmoVoNnxh/XaHCNiPQDww/wQM2711ksuIt1YDHnivJcDMSYlT/AAvwzd 55yLcOYNuRyMC8PdUIKgYy/b+lotLuie7vHTQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=dtZQ/K3+56+R07Ifx+cW+hd1m/v+vysJqOSB3do0+ndczoMDBRniHLUHgE7JyJynKy 8qVmwx0kgTvrZkrnXntCePqBdi1r3pBvZDmFrFhBPTkJ0Pqfi5JdQ7ETlMxO8iz/k8Vi MWxpyJHZnoMfeMnkaF5wbd7XlQW51JzHKbUo0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.8.9 with SMTP id 9mr4929701anh.120.1296567897286; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 05:44:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.109.16 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:44:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DEA7C481-87CF-4F21-A715-5190939CF073@nominum.com>
References: <3E0BC533-AFF7-4E5E-A52E-BD7814FC4060@hopcount.ca> <4D472D2C.9090108@cisco.com> <6819D144-A148-41AB-BF38-A888E0950D7E@hopcount.ca> <AANLkTikx-cc47UFjK6=DxwxJVraMv89L-ebBmhHPn7ZE@mail.gmail.com> <4D476699.5060105@vpnc.org> <AANLkTimcfz6sQMHQFgR2gpiBfGCndTZqbKGDugfjrPpi@mail.gmail.com> <DEA7C481-87CF-4F21-A715-5190939CF073@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:44:57 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimn5nPFAgAVygWKerceWuM5f95r=7n50+9je3Eh@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6441dd8f1e8b5049b38bc0f
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-jabley-dnsop-validator-bootstrap-00
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:41:58 -0000

Given that the chairs have asked me not to avoid making personal comments it
is not possible for me to respond appropriately to your post or Paul's that
followed.

As you both know I have professional experience and expertise in this
specific area. I have been thinking about this specific problem for over two
decades.


You have the right to think I am wrong. But until your system has functioned
in the real world for at least as long as mine you are going to have to
treat me with respect.



On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Jan 31, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> > I was going to reply to this post, then I read it and saw that you cannot
> converse in a civil fashion.
>
> What's uncivil about calling balderdash poppycock?
>
> But it's good that you didn't reply, because Paul is right.
>
>


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/