Re: Summary: What to do with expired signatures

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Mon, 18 February 2002 17:30 UTC

Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA10117 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:30:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16crT1-000JPE-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 09:20:43 -0800
Received: from dt0b4n7d.maine.rr.com ([24.95.12.125] helo=nic-naa.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16crT0-000JP7-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 09:20:42 -0800
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g1IKK7162704; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brunner@nic-naa.net)
Message-Id: <200202182020.g1IKK7162704@nic-naa.net>
To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, brunner@nic-naa.net
Subject: Re: Summary: What to do with expired signatures
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:03:15 CST." <3C7133D2.EC81BE86@ehsco.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:20:07 -0800
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

> Two reasons: out-of-band zone replication which contributes towards
> overall stability of the Internet's namespace, and zone directives

I'm at a loss to understand the first assertion offered. Oh well. ENOCLUE.


to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>