IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E2A21F8724 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0haWp7nu-nK9 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB6B21F8615 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9629BCBC41D; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:12:24 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <F17B354A-7D6D-4532-AA9B-8AB5D35A4BF8@rfc1035.com>
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwh1J8+LB44X0XmUm+Fob1bSrdJLY76Vr8qsUx0yeDat+A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:12:24 +0100
References: <1340433313.43178.YahooMailClassic@web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <B726DEA1-2E57-4E67-B481-5788CB26869E@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwh1J8+LB44X0XmUm+Fob1bSrdJLY76Vr8qsUx0yeDat+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:12:27 -0000

On 29 Jun 2012, at 15:31, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

... lengthy religious and out of scope rant deleted ...

Please take your layer 9+ arguments elsewhere. They are not  
appropriate for this list or WG. Thanks.

Let's focus on the matter at hand. Is this draft technically sound?  
Does it have engineering merit? If so, it's due proper consideration.  
If not, it dies. It's that simple.

IMO, this draft is a remarkably bad idea and does not deserve any  
attention by the WG.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status