IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sun, 04 December 2011 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A4721F85A1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:26:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.367, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QYlnJa9O1oA0 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trantor.virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:9700::dead:beef]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0F921F8564 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-24-4-109-25.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.109.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc) by trantor.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 226B81705A; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <C48E30ED-3C28-4131-863C-DAA3A843FBE8@vpnc.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 08:26:27 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8EDAE745-2E56-4528-8B46-9E714035D62C@virtualized.org>
References: <20111204074710.64552.qmail@joyce.lan> <5CB1137F-C5EB-4D21-988F-A601C3869FD4@virtualized.org> <C48E30ED-3C28-4131-863C-DAA3A843FBE8@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: dnsext Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:26:30 -0000

On Dec 4, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Alternately, you could just keep discussing it on this list (which Ralph said would remain alive) until Ralph thought the draft was mature enough for an Individual Submission.

Sure. I'll admit I'm unclear as to when something is deemed WG-worthy (I thought that was the point of a BoF, but apparently I am mistaken).

> There is no IETF process rule that says an out-of-charter idea needs to have any face-to-face BoF ...

If DNSEXT were to be shut down, there would no longer be a charter to be out-of.

Regards,
-drc

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status