Re: Compliance tests (Was: Re: Summary: What to do with expired signatures)
Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com> Sun, 17 February 2002 03:29 UTC
Received: from psg.com (exim@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA21338 for <dnsext-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 22:29:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from lserv by psg.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16cHqj-000NIf-00 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:18:49 -0800
Received: from as.vix.com ([204.152.187.70]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16cHqi-000NIZ-00 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:18:48 -0800
Received: from as.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by as.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D718528EB0 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:18:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vixie@as.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Compliance tests (Was: Re: Summary: What to do with expired signatures)
In-Reply-To: Message from Stefan Arentz <stefan.arentz@soze.com> of "Sat, 16 Feb 2002 20:32:04 +0100." <20020216203203.A439@keyser.soze.com>
X-Mailer: mh-e 6.0; nmh 1.0.4; Emacs 21.1
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:18:47 -0800
Message-Id: <20020217031847.D718528EB0@as.vix.com>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
> I think the whole DNS developer community would benefit from such a > test suite. > > Anyone interested? yes. but, funding it has been a problem. isc's new BIND Forum ought, if successful, provide the continuous background funding needed for this kind of task. we'll certainly let y'all know. to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>