IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] [Errata Rejected] RFC6840 (4191)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 12 January 2015 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5F11A9067; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:26:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQ54kay4RecI; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2191A903D; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E2BCF18008C; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:25:32 -0800 (PST)
To: edward.lewis@icann.org, weiler@tislabs.com, davidb@verisign.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150112132532.E2BCF18008C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:25:32 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/N9HMG0cgJgWfJAJMn7tHyoRjIE4>
Cc: brian@innovationslab.net, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Errata Rejected] RFC6840 (4191)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:26:16 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6840,
"Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6840&eid=4191

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
Date Reported: 2014-12-02
Rejected by: Brian Haberman (IESG)

Section: 5.11

Original Text
-------------
...

A signed zone MUST include a DNSKEY for each algorithm present in
      the zone's DS RRset and expected trust anchors for the zone.  The
      zone MUST also be signed with each algorithm (though not each key)
      present in the DNSKEY RRset.  

Corrected Text
--------------
A signed zone MUST include a DNSKEY for each algorithm present in
      the zone's DS RRset and expected trust anchors for the zone.  Each
      authoritative RRset in the zone MUST be signed with each 
      algorithm (though not each key) present in the DNSKEY RRset.  

Notes
-----
Zones aren't signed (per se), the data sets within them are.  But not cut point (NS) and glue.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
 This erratum is being rejected as the nomenclature being updated is understood within the community and is used in other DNSSEC specifications.  

--------------------------------------
RFC6840 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)
Publication Date    : February 2013
Author(s)           : S. Weiler, Ed., D. Blacka, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : DNS Extensions
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email