Re: The problem I see with DNSSEC as a potential end user and administrator.

Duane at e164 dot org <duane@e164.org> Fri, 08 August 2008 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9754D3A6B45; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.345
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MEtlVe17gGhM; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B939B3A690C; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 02:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KRO1h-0009UO-Sc for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:12:49 +0000
Received: from [208.82.100.153] (helo=mail.aus-biz.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <duane@e164.org>) id 1KRO1e-0009Tt-7s for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:12:47 +0000
Received: from [192.168.100.244] (dsl-48-19.qld1.net.au [125.168.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.aus-biz.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAFE6FF271; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:12:43 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <489C0E08.3040406@e164.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:12:40 +1000
From: Duane at e164 dot org <duane@e164.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
CC: Namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>, bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
Subject: Re: The problem I see with DNSSEC as a potential end user and administrator.
References: <489BE047.1010100@e164.org> <e90946380808080203g65c99a72meca9db15c1194df1@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e90946380808080203g65c99a72meca9db15c1194df1@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

Ondřej Surý wrote:

> I know that it does add more burder of shoulder of any sysadmin, but
> is it really so much - add a cron job and some monitoring script and
> you are done?

at some point you load the beasts of burden up with so much work that
one extra piece of straw is all that is needed or takes to break the
poor animals back.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>