IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Fri, 26 September 2008 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEEC3A6AEE; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IE4Dc6SQ0GfG; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A213A69B9; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KjGG8-0008jo-O9 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:33:36 +0000
Received: from [193.227.124.2] (helo=mx01.bfk.de) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <fweimer@bfk.de>) id 1KjGFv-0008hx-GC for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:33:35 +0000
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1KjGFd-0000MB-HF; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:33:05 +0200
Received: from fweimer by bfk.de with local id 1KjGFl-0002ax-9y; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:33:14 +0200
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Reminder: two WGLC closing in one week
References: <20080919004547.GD2037@commandprompt.com>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:33:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20080919004547.GD2037@commandprompt.com> (Andrew Sullivan's message of "Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:45:47 -0400")
Message-ID: <82ljxe3m0m.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

* Andrew Sullivan:

> draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-14.txt 

I've read the draft and have got three minor nits:

DO necessarily implies UD because the synthesized CNAME is not signed
and thus not visible to a DNSSEC client (section 3.1).

The resolution algorithm in section 3.2 should be omitted because it
potentially conflicts with the wildcard-clarify work.

I'm not sure the advice in section 5.3.1 is entirely correct.  The gap
signalled by NSEC RRs does not necessarily lie completely below the
DNAME.

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email