Re: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing

[Andrew Sullivan <[e-mail]>]

Unless I completely overlooked it, he didn't request a slot in the meeting. 

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
<[e-mail]>

On 2010-10-13, at 17:32, "Jeffrey A. Williams" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Andrew and all,
> 
>  I noticed that Phillips proposal is not on the list.
> Was there some reason as to why not?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Sullivan <[e-mail]>
>> Sent: Oct 13, 2010 4:15 PM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Subject: [dnsext] Meeting in Beijing
>> 
>> Dear colleagues,
>> 
>> At the moment, we have a very light agenda for the Beijing meeting.
>> These are the items for which we've received requests:
>> 
>> 1.  A brief presentation on a DNSSEC history wiki (with a solitication
>> for participation).
>> 
>> 2.  A discussion of draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00.
>> 
>> 3.  A discussion of draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-0[1|2].
>> 
>> We'd like people to treat (3) as though it's a WG draft.  Assuming the
>> charter we sent to the IESG gets approved, that document will
>> automatically become a WG document by virtue of the charter adoption.
>> We're being careful not to step out of process, however, and as of
>> right now, the document isn't strictly speaking on charter.
>> 
>> Our feeling is that a meeting of this sort can be completed within an
>> hour or so.  However, we find ourselves at the moment with a much
>> longer slot (currently, Wed. morning, for 2 1/2 hours.  We didn't ask
>> for that much; it is apparently mostly to deal with scheduling
>> difficulties).
>> 
>> I note, however, that we have a number of drafts that have been
>> lingering for some time.  This is mostly due to inertia.  Olafur and I
>> therefore propose to use the extra time as a breakout session to nail
>> down whatever changes are still needed in those lingering drafts.  If
>> we can get five committed reviewers for each document in the room, and
>> get the necessary text compromises settled, we can then immediately
>> send them through WGLC, and we would clear our docket.  We think this
>> would be a productive use of the time.
>> 
>> If you have objections to this plan, please let us know.  If you do
>> not so object, we'll take that as an indication that the plan sounds
>> sensible.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Andrew and Olafur.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> [e-mail]
>> Shinkuro, Inc.
>> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!)
> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
> 
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
> often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
> 
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
> depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
> Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail [e-mail]
> Phone: [phone]
> 
> 
>