[dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4509 (2752)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 24 March 2011 02:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FCF3A67C0 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ayh6X4KeNpji for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53C83A67B2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 89176E0733; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: hardaker@tislabs.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, ogud@ogud.com, ajs@shinkuro.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110324023410.89176E0733@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:34:10 -0700
Cc: matt@mattmccutchen.net, dnsext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4509 (2752)
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:32:37 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4509, "Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4509&eid=2752 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Section: RFC header Original Text ------------- Corrected Text -------------- Updates: 4035 Notes ----- This document should update RFC 4035 because the statement in section 3, "Validator implementations SHOULD ignore DS RRs containing SHA-1 digests if DS RRs with SHA-256 digests are present in the DS RRset", modifies the rules for authenticating referrals in RFC 4035 section 5.2. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4509 (draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-05) -------------------------------------- Title : Use of SHA-256 in DNSSEC Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Records (RRs) Publication Date : May 2006 Author(s) : W. Hardaker Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DNS Extensions Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4509 (275… RFC Errata System
- Re: [dnsext] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4509 … Olafur Gudmundsson