Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Mon, 05 December 2011 13:29 UTC
Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8791821F8B7C for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:29:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.005
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDsWxga-9nXG for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:29:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C4A3721F8B61 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 05:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9592 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2011 14:02:34 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 5 Dec 2011 14:02:34 -0000
Message-ID: <4EDCC713.2030200@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:28:51 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <002301ccb1bc$d6c84980$ca01a8c0@computer> <7E643BE4-8E59-4C1A-B8EC-7EC430DD2A51@vpnc.org> <a06240801cb001060e91a@[192.168.128.223]> <20111205123652.GE84440@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111205123652.GE84440@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:29:31 -0000
Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Edward Lewis wrote: >> However, the WG really hasn't >> shown much in the way of progress, even when viewed over the long >> haul. DNSEXT was formed in about 1999, with the conclusion of two >> other DNS related WGs. In the 12 year run how many documents made >> it to Full Standard or even Draft Standard? (Not very many.) > Speaking only personally, I think the above two observations by Ed are > the key: Isn't it a well known problem of IETF standardization process to require irrational amount of effort to advance PS to DS and DS to IS? > We > could go further and note that the last big push in the WG was to get > DNSSEC -- a real extension -- done. DNSSEC is a real extension? You should be joking. Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jiankang Yao
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jiankang YAO
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xna… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Murray S. Kucherawy