Re: [dnsext] Question on characters in DNS lookups?

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Mon, 07 March 2011 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7A33A69A3 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 06:12:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id olYaLqCLF0Jw for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 06:12:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A913A6998 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 06:12:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (gatt.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p27EDY7m021712; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:13:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.119] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:13:40 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:13:40 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240801c99a9856537c@[10.31.200.119]>
In-Reply-To: <a06240800c99a97b92e63@[192.168.1.103]>
References: <ACD95DD2-6FBA-42F1-84E6-7C8D798FF1C1@icsi.berkeley.edu><20110304154257.GA 27387@nic.fr> <20110304220531.4F9BBBAA5ED@drugs.dv.isc.org> <a06240800c9980906d20e@[10.31.200.123]> <4D72DBF1.6070501@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <a06240800c99a97b92e63@[192.168.1.103]>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:13:32 -0500
To: dnsext@ietf.org
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Question on characters in DNS lookups?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:12:30 -0000

D'oh!!!

Not in violation - it's what is recommended.

Gotta stop writing email while watching TV.

At 9:11 -0500 3/7/11, Edward Lewis wrote:
>At 9:57 +0900 3/6/11, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>>Edward Lewis wrote:
>>
>>>   # CNAME a domain name.
>>
>>For an example, see RFC2317, a BCP.
>
>Hmmph.  A case of a BCP recommending actions in "violation" of a 
>standards track document.
>
>Interesting catch...;)

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Me to infant son: "Waah! Waah! Is that all you can say?  Waah?"
Son: "Waah!"