Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 30 May 2012 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0E221F86E2 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JR9l6DmzNRE9 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFFB21F86DE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4UCQvSn038306; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:26:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201205301226.q4UCQvSn038306@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Marc Lampo <marc.lampo@eurid.eu>
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 30 May 2012 13:31:03 +0200. <004d01cd3e57$b230ec80$1692c580$@lampo@eurid.eu>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:26:57 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:27:37 -0000
There is an order between sections but no order inside a section. BTW DNSSEC RRs can go in a different section than the RRsets they protect. Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ? Marc Lampo
- Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ? Francis Dupont