Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Sat, 02 October 2010 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008C93A6D4A; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RJiVh5hXrYO; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF3C3A6BCF; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1P1qek-000M5p-SR for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:12:54 +0000
Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com ([74.125.82.180]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <hallam@gmail.com>) id 1P1qee-000M4n-Pq for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:12:49 +0000
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so4880673wyj.11 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EOUVrgMx4P21QiG+8GV9jKbeV0UsQz7QQr68Qj44mtE=; b=cn0kS8FDC0m0FwFQNFBAVD5088GpiOsTTNJGL6WazVyx7GihP1X/DEBP4xJ/B20Iy1 6vNkuGovcPRJMjPR/YkKxX1HwXe9h490bVtvGR5+OXdlDV3sgUt+wNpVHDlitzPsL4g7 v+0vQKYdyOdZSr+pO7y2I2at6aXja5Le3XK+U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=t3XvnrRbNS/IMBfp6zVknfCFnUwHySdr1crFFQVckZxFyvXbWOufc+BIbwoVhD8NI0 RFGoFc6YaI8QmXuTUtMjfANT6hYuiGj8NeIGZvPSXHnDZ1RXeBWklw3g6RJDCWfnFhe/ 3oO2EO2cVKD5I06A5Yj0J9dqqpp9FrwJijpaw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.173.8 with SMTP id u8mr415432wel.9.1285981966957; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.166.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20101001181009.GZ8669@shinkuro.com>
References: <20100930212134.GK8669@shinkuro.com> <AANLkTinn+UYJ+tcJyXptVC9aLzk-DS9aX4964KOEWGTA@mail.gmail.com> <289ACF85-8360-4D90-9CD1-FFA7986E026F@shinkuro.com> <12036.1285904617@nsa.vix.com> <20101001170617.GY8669@shinkuro.com> <a06240802c8cbcfb730dd@10.31.200.147> <20101001181009.GZ8669@shinkuro.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:12:46 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=NwBCh0Qyp4=kvAccMukPP7=Y-GH=MUW4ZqzHi@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Progress on moving the mailing list
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Cc: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fb01153fdd40491980292
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

How about change the list name to namedroppers@ieft.org and make
namedroppers@ops.ietf.org and dnsext@ietf.org aliases?

I think we definitely need an alias or else people trying to cc the DNSEXT
WG are going to miss.


One of the consequences of the lists moving to ietf.org is that they now
represent institutional memory that often extends beyond the lifetime of the
original WG. It is quite possible that in ten years time that DNSEXT will be
closed, but there will still be a need for ongoing observation and
discussion of DNS issues.

It is even quite possible that at some point in the future there might be a
DNSEXT2 come out of those discussions and the same community of interest
would be engaged so the namedroppers list could become a WG list a third
time.