Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 08 March 2011 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1C03A67B3 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:30:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ZIfRCjymW46 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:30:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9C93A6806 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:49776) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Px3Zd-00023i-Yi (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:32:05 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1Px3Zd-0006qh-OC (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:32:05 +0000
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:32:05 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: george.barwood@blueyonder.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <C99C3502.72B1%roy@nominet.org.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103082030190.5244@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <C99C3502.72B1%roy@nominet.org.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:30:55 -0000

On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Roy Arends wrote:
>
>    D.    Motivation for the new RRTYPE application?
>
>          To allow a copy of the DS RRset [RFC4034] to be published
>          in the child zone, which is used to update the parent DS RRset.
>          It is expected that this will allow the rollover of a key signing
>          key to be automated.

Why not just use the child zone's SEP DNSKEY RRs for this purpose?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Humber, Thames, Dover: West or southwest 5 to 7, occasionally 4. Slight or
moderate, occasionally rough. Occasional rain or showers. Moderate or good.