IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 09 March 2011 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C90E3A69E4 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:28:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koGRD+XKwEqK for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C8F3A69BE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:28:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:41691) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1PxKOI-0001dk-SA (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:29:30 +0000
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1PxKOI-0004fC-MJ (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:29:30 +0000
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:29:30 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: George Barwood <george.barwood@blueyonder.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <758260B7B5B34599BA80D9BA5A3840C0@local>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1103091426390.5244@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <C99C3502.72B1%roy@nominet.org.uk><alpine.LSU.2.00.1103082030190.5244@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk><72A22513B1644CFE9023189F93BFDD32@local> <20110309080006.GA23957@miek.nl> <758260B7B5B34599BA80D9BA5A3840C0@local>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] CDS RRTYPE review - Comments period end Mar 29th
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:28:17 -0000

On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, George Barwood wrote:
>
> But these are really just examples, fundamentally it's just proper design.
> It gives the child zone proper control of the parent DS RRset.

Thanks for pointing out the part of your draft that I missed. I searched
for KSK and SEP and didn't find any matches.

The reason I asked the question is that there would be a very nice economy
in re-using the existing SEP mechanism for this purpose. There's a certain
parallel between automatically maintaining trust anchors and automatically
maintaining secure delegations.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
South-east Iceland: Mainly northerly or northeasterly 5 or 6, occasionally 4.
Very rough or high. Wintry showers. Good, occasionally poor. Occasional light
icing in north.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email