IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] Re: dnsext[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 (7972)

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 06 June 2024 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C93AC151069 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDQ0ep73nJoy for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96877C14F6B4 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [197.243.42.91]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A450E206A2; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 04:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net A450E206A2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1717672450; bh=5RBxal4LTCPLvvG4rSStf20NhU7HwSlL/FXvJRzzpBs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EmLc3zItcPvflRXWGDJxIB0sSpFBYGaaO5KENIHdAEZNZYm6DMwVKee77YSOXR4i6 Q8vra+8bWZYK9ra0f2mg24J1mu+H/L9yj4Q1OItGf90KWv2gHNPj4vm8l6xAhceve+ 5/gdfyHLasyFFUSp4BAu2w7PwlR15L3h1/tFZBII=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20240606030200.293F557A1964@orthanc.hactrn.net> (Rob Austein's message of "Wed, 05 Jun 2024 23:02:00 -0400")
References: <20240606023706.9A985C000063@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org> <20240606030200.293F557A1964@orthanc.hactrn.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 04:14:01 -0700
Message-ID: <yblr0dacohy.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID-Hash: UKRAF4EL5SDQWFJNPMLVXAMT6RCG44K3
X-Message-ID-Hash: UKRAF4EL5SDQWFJNPMLVXAMT6RCG44K3
X-MailFrom: wjhns1@hardakers.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsext.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, nate@natechoe.dev, roy.arends@telin.nl, sra@isc.org, mlarson@verisign.com, massey@cs.colostate.edu, scott.rose@nist.gov, dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [dnsext] Re: dnsext[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4035 (7972)
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsext/UIQSYfJPzc-2r3gaNlHila6-2OM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsext>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsext-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsext-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsext-leave@ietf.org>

Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> writes:

> I think I disagree.  "MUST" is keyword, "must" is not.
[...]

Agreed with everyone else's comments at this point.  We try to avoid
using the lower case must, but there are many documents with lower case
musts in them.

Of the 1000 somewhat recent RFCs from 8000 to 8999 there are 965 that
contain the lower case must word somewhere.  Which is funny because only
800 of them have the upper case must in it.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status