IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 31 August 2011 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2310921F8B66 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WflJ1tQdc4Y0 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A2221F8678 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shinkuro.com (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DD0F1ECB41C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:27:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:27:45 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110831162745.GH99260@shinkuro.com>
References: <20110830162134.GB84494@shinkuro.com> <CAMbvoa+nh5k8eOA-XRwBD5oxm17+=Q4gCagq0OBS5OEQX=g1sw@mail.gmail.com> <20110831031256.GA98758@shinkuro.com> <CAAF6GDfA3+A+fJz2TY+Jg5WcVWkpAdR8n-4tXMC+zQYe9aGYpw@mail.gmail.com> <20110831114728.GA99123@shinkuro.com> <CAMbvoa+Y7JByefPxYEnDH3WVDuK3CdVfyo2kgqNXHuG_W4M7VA@mail.gmail.com> <20110831142557.GB99260@shinkuro.com> <CAMbvoaJGRQtThUta+mM1DinNEZ9WOA8aLmBknsrw50+34h5JcQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMbvoaJGRQtThUta+mM1DinNEZ9WOA8aLmBknsrw50+34h5JcQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:26:14 -0000

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:

> However, we're still quoting an I-D here and not an RFC. I assume we
> need this draft published before the policy can be followed. (But
> please do correct me if I'm wrong.) From the last discussion about it
> (May 2011) it looks to me like the author is still working on a -06 so
> we're not there yet.

Exactly correct.

> Which means that for now edns-client-subnet needs to be published as
> an experimental RFC, which I assume can't be done in just a few
> weeks.

Probably not a few weeks, no.

> By the way, I noticed not all EDNS0 option codes on
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters have RFC numbers behind
> them. Under what condition were these option codes assigned, and would
> it be possible to assign one to edns-client-subnet under similar
> conditions?

Yes.  I have no idea how those were assigned, but when I asked IANA
about it they said they have to follow the rule.  Perhaps previous
IANA administration had a different approach or something; I don't
know.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email