Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Fri, 15 April 2011 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03831E07CF for <dnsext@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.758, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwM47WICTshe for <dnsext@ietfc.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA91E07EE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vxg33 with SMTP id 33so2827964vxg.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0eLLUdt186xqf0u6xEzdGpApexbTgJcZ0dOzjHFgUeQ=; b=a1673ytcAhrac4jxn5+OaLAjKeqnguzcuqKpbSQ7VldHCyhPY504paD/PAsbUSrk7Q wYIr0wIWgJvHvtpcwxDxcn8Az8ZsWQi0fmsER2Rj5Hd+ntMM2FC7hImDEfjmGnOTX4r+ M24qV6NvZAh/0s5CdPG0+ZbOeweEfBsWUrHlo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dtwXj/lnRw+NBlEwxg/Cla4fGoWTXZCdEBTykqOvE4tfvPleehMoC3ctNjml1gual8 3xb5CxmuV/VyBetjqbokBEksnWI7N5OEEKXOdEjBP4XzvwKlpQwYT+OKc/FS9x55w2s/ RcOIdGorXLZ6xjNik37KNkX4XDo4pyd52Dg4o=
Received: by 10.52.0.228 with SMTP id 4mr3421481vdh.107.1302889575146; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.160.168 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikO4uM11gJUDO2qEqTga2U2SSocHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110413151032.GK24471@shinkuro.com> <BANLkTikO4uM11gJUDO2qEqTga2U2SSocHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:45:55 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTinZxg5U=KgBj9WkQGrXyYgGDWrsAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: scott.rose@nist.gov, dnsext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC: draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:46:19 -0000

I'm fine either way but I suppose it would make it easier to find if
it claimed to update those RFCs.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street
 Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have read the draft and support it being published.
> That said, should this doc update RFC 1035 and/or RFC 2672(bis)?  There is a
> fine line between "clarifying" and "updating".  This isn't a show-stopper
> IMHO, but since this clarification is important to implementors, it probably
> should be noted.
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> This message starts a two-week WGLC on the draft
>> draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-03.txt.  While we did not formally
>> take the step of adopting that I-D as a WG document, it is
>> sufficiently related to the topic of RFC2672bis that your chairs
>> believe it should be processed at the same time.
>>
>> Please review the draft.  If you support publication, please state as
>> much on the list.  If you are opposed to publication, please state
>> that on the list as well.  It is more helpful to have your reasons for
>> your position as part of your statement.
>>
>> According to the usual DNSEXT convention, we require at least five
>> reviews in favour of publication in order to proceed.  Five supportive
>> reviewers is a necessary but not sufficient condition for publication
>> (i.e. evidence of significant opposition counts against a measure of
>> rough consensus).
>>
>> The WGLC will end on 2011-04-27 at 21:00 UTC.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andrew (as document shepherd)
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs@shinkuro.com
>> Shinkuro, Inc.